My Philosophy of Education Summary

In most of todays classrooms we the students be seated in rows of desks. We be forced to sit and listen to the teacher, be it in biology, math, English, and memorize line after line of information. We are receptacles to be filled by the teachers. We have deliver the goods acquaintance as an absolute if we complete the course with a %100. As society is controling today, students beingness given the stamp of approval arent re wholey ready to enter todays world. If youre going to school to be a biologist, it isnt just enough to know that water enters and exits the cadre through a process called osmosis. You need to know why You need to be able to see all of this information on a often broader scope than it has been presented to you. Students need to be taught to absorb this knowledge rather than to memorize it. The main problem of todays educational system is that it most of the multiplication does not teach how to think critically. I propose a system of education in which te achers are not just depositing information in students, in which students are not just passive observers in an active world and in which knowledge is not just an absolute.The first thing that needs to be done to achieve my system (philosophy) of education is to change the way teachers are teaching all together. How legion(predicate) times do students talking amongst themselves outside the classroom about how good their teachers are. They go to class and move with one teacher, and are taught everything from that one teachers perspective. In order to give the students a oft broader perspective, two or maybe even three teachers, depending on the subject, should be placed in a class room. Each teacher would then present the information to the class. The students would then have a often broader spectrum of information to learn from. I am not implying that these teachers should tag-team forcing information down the students throat, save take different approaches in helping them absor b the information through problem posing. The teachers are not placed in this system to stand high up on their pedestals throwing assignments at the students, but are to be reckoning hand in hand with them. They would be teaching from the students almost as much as they would be teaching them.In an educational environment such as this one, the students should be able to stand in the teachers place and teach the teachers and their mate students as well. The students are active participants here. They should be schooling as much from their peers as their teachers, if not more. This system could create a lot more work for the students, but not as much of the busy work we receive, and tire of, today. For example, students could be asked to do wistful writings, in which they would share what they have learned in the lessons. Student lead discussions would also take up a large portion of the time in these classroom environments. What mend test of ones knowledge than being put in a p osition where you are leased to teach your fellow student? After each session both the student and the teach will go topographic point feeling not stuffed with information, but a new view on roughly things that they would ponder as they head out into the rest of their daily routines.The basis of this system isnt what the teachers are teaching, or what the students are learning. It is how we perceive this thing we call knowledge. In this world knowledge isnt something tangible. It is not viewed as an absolute. friendship is an ongoing process that will never have a climax or an end. It is something that will cut through to grow and change through the timeline of our people. Knowledge is not what the students are learning, or what the teachers are teaching. It is the process of self-discovery. A teacher could tell a student that when you mix chemical A and chemical B they lay down chemical C. That isnt the knowledge. The student can then actually mix chemical A and chemical B a nd watch them make chemical C. That isnt knowledge. Knowledge is that individuals learning of how those to things interact and why when they mix they form chemical C. Knowledge is the process of education through self-discovery.This system I have shown you would change the way education is viewed in this world. If we had teachers that actually taught, and students that questioned the answers they were given, wed be much better off as a whole. If we keep going the way were going where are all the creative minds going to be coming from in the next few years? If students continue byword that A + B = C, what are we going to do when the world poses us more complex problems that require ingenuity, creativity and drive to solve? We just need to understand that knowledge is not just some gold star, or trophy each of us can achieve, but a method of learning and understanding that our society needs t